Let me preface this technical explanation with this: if there are any mets or physicists checking this out, I am taking certain liberties and shortcuts in this discussion. That out of the way, here goes:
Often, when there is a strong cold front with high speed low level jetstream winds not far from the surface, a very strong barometric pressure gradient occurs with the passage of the front. Most of the bloggers here have heard of ISOBARS--lines of equal barometric pressure taken at surface observation points. In this type of pattern experienced early this morning, we looked at another parameter: ISALLOBARS--lines of an equal rate of barometric pressure changes (up or down a certain number of millibars). Meteorologists look for ISALLOBARIC COUPLETS with the passage of fronts to see if there is a very tight gradient of pressure falls and rises just ahead of and just behind the front. ISALLOBARIC COUPLETS, when tight and strong enough, enable strong winds aloft to mix down to the surface more readily. Late last night, an ISALLOBARIC COUPLET of a 5mb change in 3 hours was considered impressive enough to forecast strong winds with gusts of up to 50 mph possible. 5mb in 3 hours is quite a significant couplet. But, instead, a shocking 14mb/3 hour change occurred. Sharp falls ahead of the front and steep rises immediately behind the front create a "wind tunnel" toward the east into the weak pressure from the sharp jump (here's the shorthand: "nature abhors a vacuum"). The strength of this ISALLOBARIC COUPLET was simply not evident in last evening's soundings or model runs. A fairly strong couplet was evident, but not a powerful 14mb/5hr couplet--which is relatively rare.
As to why the couplet strengthened so much, I still don't have all the answers. A similar but worse case occurred 2 nights ago over Wisconsin, when tornadoes and damaging straightline winds developed unexpectedly. But by last evening, there was scant evidence of such strengthening at our latitude. The Storm Prediction Center didn't have us at risk for severe weather, either. The risk was believed to be further to the SW (where conditions were far more unstable, and there was more spin potential in the lower atmosphere).
One element we did call correctly was on the timing. Although the Wind Advisory was not to go into effect until 7am, we did say at 11 that some folks would receive an early wakeup call from the strong winds around 4:30 to 5am. Not good enough, but at least it's something....